Saturday, August 3, 2019
Abolishing Poverty in The United States :: Poverty Essays
Abolishing Poverty in The United States      Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  If I had the power to abolish poverty in the United States I would do  it in a second. Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there are  just to many poor people for one person to help. To abolish poverty we must all  work to help those who are poor get out of this condition.    Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  There are two types of poor, there are people who are relatively poor  and there are people who are absolutely poor. People who are relatively poor  are poor compared to the people around them. These people usually only have  the bare necessities to survive like food, clothing or shelter. They might even  have a steady job but they just don't have any real wealth. In fact people who  are relatively poor are usually in the lower 5% of the population in terms of  wealth. People who live the state of absolute poverty can not sustain a  certain level of living . These people have a hard time getting money for food ,  clothing, or shelter. People who are absolutely poor have a rough time getting  money to put food on the table one day and the next day they might not have any  money to put food on the table. Not all people who are relatively poor are  absolutely poor, but, all people who are absolutely poor are relatively poor.  These types of poor are found all throughout the world especially in  underdeveloped countries. In the United States a advanced well-developed  country both absolute and relative poverty are present throughout the country.    Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  I think that absolute poverty has no beneficial purposes to society.  However, relative poverty does have beneficial functions. I think that relative  poverty can make people competitive. It would do this because people always try  to do better then the people around them. This competitiveness might force  people to work overtime or even two jobs in order to make more than the people  around them. There are some major costs that both poverty's have on society.  These costs include: In areas of high poverty there are usually the same areas  of high violence. A second cost to society might be that some people in  poverty might become welfare dependent, this means that they rely solely on  welfare to pay for everything and they don't even try to find a job of there  own. These negative costs definitely outweigh the benefits.    Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  Ã  If I had control of the poverty situation in the United States I would  only try to eliminate absolute poverty. I first would raise the taxes of the    					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.